T14 Advancements in the Science and Management of Wildfire Impacts on the Critical Zone

Sunday, 15 October 2023
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
317 / 318

POST-FIRE DEBRIS FLOW OBSERVATIONS FOLLOWING THE GRIZZLY CREEK FIRE, GLENWOOD CANYON, COLORADO, USA: LESSONS LEARNED

Paper number: T14-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:05 AM – 8:20 AM

Authors

Abstract

We evaluated the performance of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) postfire debris-flow (PFDF) likelihood and volume models over a two-year period within the 2020 Grizzly Creek Fire burn perimeter in Glenwood Canyon, Colorado, USA. For this study we developed 2 observational datasets: 1) paired rainfall intensity-debris flow response measurements using a network of 11 rain gages for evaluating the likelihood model, and 2) repeat lidar data for evaluating the volume model. The likelihood model predicts rainfall-intensity thresholds that are expected to trigger a debris flow at a specific stream segment or basin, and the volume model predicts the volume of material mobilized by debris flows. Our results show that 89% of first year postfire debris flows were triggered by rainfall intensities exceeding the USGS PFDF likelihood model thresholds. In contrast, no debris flows were observed the second year postfire, despite eight storms with rainfall intensities exceeding modeled thresholds. Consequently, we found the operational USGS PFDF likelihood model may be too conservative after the first year due to vegetation recovery. Additionally, the USGS PFDF volume model overpredicted debris flow volumes during the first year postfire, with observed volumes between one-fifth to one-quarter of the predicted volume. This suggests the operational USGS PFDF volume model could be adjusted with a correction factor for this region to account for local differences in sediment production. These findings reveal that overall vegetation recovery and sediment exhaustion affects both first-year volume predictions and second-year rainfall thresholds, and therefore should be taken into account with the development of future models.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 55, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2023AM-391842

© Copyright 2023 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.