T68 Convergent Margin Systems
Sunday, 15 October 2023
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
326
OROGENIC CRUSTAL ARCHITECTURE AND SHORTENING DISTRIBUTION: INSIGHTS FROM NORTHERN PATAGONIA AND DISCUSSION OF THE ANDEAN-TYPE MOUNTAIN BUILDING STYLE
Paper number: T68-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:20 PM – 2:40 PM
Authors
-
Andres Echaurren Presenting AuthorInstituto Argentino de Nivología, Glaciología y Ciencias Ambientales (IANIGLA), Mendoza
-
Guido GianniUniversidad de Nacional San Juan, San Juan
-
Lucía SagripantiInstituto de Estudios Andinos (IDEAN), Buenos Aires,
-
Patricio ZambranoUniversidad Andrés Bello, Concepción
-
Alfonso EncinasUniversidad de Concepción, Concepción
-
Andres FolgueraUniversidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires
Abstract
This issue is clearly exemplified in the Andes, the archetype of subduction orogeny. Here, segmentation of the mountain belt has been traditionally addressed as a function of its contrasted along-strike topography and lateral development, crustal shortening-thickening values, and structural styles. However, jointed across-strike analyses involving both the forearc (prowedge) and retroarc (retrowedge) are scarce, leaving crucial parameters such as shortening distribution somehow ignored. This factor is important when considering opposed models of Andean orogenic vergence, i.e., with overall trenchward or cratonward tectonic transport.
In this contribution I discuss this problem through new data of the north Patagonian margin. Particularly, new field work and seismic data (borehole-controlled 2D seismic lines and basement isobaths) provide a structural and stratigraphic characterization of the forearc that is integrated with the retroarc structure. The tectonic controlling factors of the Neogene mountain building stage are analyzed with respect to the pro-and retrowedges differential growth, and the role of a major west-directed (trenchward) crustal fault is discussed within the continental-scale configuration of the Andes. According to shortening distribution between the orogenic wedges, the Andean orogenic architecture is compared with type-examples of collisional orogens, and the driving mechanisms are discussed.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 55, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2023AM-392738
© Copyright 2023 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.