T119 Geology and Society Division at 20 I: How Geology Shapes Society – Past, Present, and Future
Monday, 16 October 2023
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
333
CRITICAL MINERALS PRODUCTION AND THE FUTURE OF MINING: MINIMIZING ADVERSE OUTCOMES TO THE ENVIRONMENT AND COMMUNITIES
Paper number: T119-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:55 PM – 3:10 PM
Authors
-
David H.M. AldertonGeology In The Public Interest, Vashon, WA
-
Ernesto O. CorderoSaint Paul University / University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON
-
Etzigueri Gongora UbedaUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México, MEXICO CITY, DF
-
Jeffrey GreenbergTitusville, FL
-
James HellerAlabama Department of Environmental Management, Montgomery, AL
-
Marli MillerUniversity of Oregon, Eugene, OR
-
David K. NormanGeology In The Public Interest, Vashon, WA
-
Arthur ReisGeology In The Public Interest, Vashon, WA
-
Tricia R. SearsWashington Geological Survey, Olympia, WA
Abstract
A significant portion of the required metal production is expected to come from areas previously untouched by mining activities, often situated on lands controlled by indigenous groups or considered sacred. Regardless of location, mining proposals can negatively impact rural communities and landscapes, with that harm extending far into the future. The conflict is a common one: that of short-term financial gain at the expense of conservation and environmental protection. We contend that this conflict would be eliminated if existing and new mining projects first met “responsible mining” standards, and then fully accounted for social and environmental costs that are poorly quantified and rarely counted.
While today’s mining practices fall far short of being sustainable, the push for minerals required for today’s decarbonizing technologies provides an opportunity for the mining industry to meet a higher standard. A paradigm shift is necessary, viewing mining as a potential contributor to a circular economy involving waste valorization, repurposing, and comprehensive environmental remediation. Additionally, affected communities must be empowered with resources to assess the pros and cons of mining proposals, as they lack the means to engage effectively and ensure their place at the decision table.
In this paper, we will review several past and current mining proposals and examine the conflicts that made them newsworthy, including such projects as the Oak Flat deposit in Arizona, Lithium America’s Thacker Pass project, the Pebble Mine in Alaska, the Twin Metals project in Minnesota and the Panguna mine in Papua New Guinea. Resolution to conflicts like these requires all sides to come together around a forward-thinking stance that values place, people, justice, and future generations.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 55, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2023AM-393850
© Copyright 2023 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.