T194 Cushman Foundation Symposium: In Pursuit of Understanding the Distribution of Benthic Foraminifera: Honoring the Career of Martin A. Buzas
Tuesday, 17 October 2023
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
321
MIOCENE FORAMINIFERA FROM IODP SITE 374-U1521: A CENTRAL ROSS SEA RECORD OF THE MCO AND MMCT
Paper number: T194-13
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:30 PM – 4:45 PM
Authors
-
Robert LeckieUniversity of Massachusetts Amherst, Amherst, MA
-
Francesca SangiorgiUtrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht
-
Anne H. KegelUtrecht University, Utrecht, Utrecht
-
David HarwoodUniversity of Nebraska Lincoln, Lincoln, NE
Abstract
Based on a cluster analysis, the foraminiferal assemblages follow shifts in the lithologic units. Unit IV (MCO) contains the most diverse and relatively abundant assemblage including Uvigerina, and the endemic planktic Antarcticella antarctica. Unit III (MCO) generally has the lowest foraminiferal recovery. During much of Unit III deposition, we suspect dissolution of calcareous benthics by corrosive waters from open water diatom productivity and higher flux of organic matter to the seafloor. The lowest Unit III cluster, with abundant Globocassidulina and Nonionella, coincides with alternating diatom-rich and mud-rich lithologies and heterotrophic dinoflagellates. The short-lived middle cluster of Globobulimina coincides with an increase in brackish algae, suggesting stratification due to meltwater and low oxygen at depth. The uppermost cluster in Unit III, with Globocassidulina and Uvigerina, coincides with a dominance of autotrophic dinoflagellates. Both Units IV and III have rare occurrences of subpolar/temperate planktics during interglacials, suggesting episodic incursions of warm surface water into the Ross Sea during the MCO. Unit II (MMCT) contains increased neritic taxa, a decrease in Uvigerina, and absence of “warm” planktics. We suggest the decrease in Uvigerina (a shelf edge proxy) between Unit IV and II tracks the northward progradation of the Ross continental shelf. The absence of agglutinated benthic foraminifera suggests there was no High Salinity Shelf Water production during the middle Miocene, therefore no polynya and weak katabatic winds. Lastly, our initial comparison with AND-2A yields similar environmental interpretations supported by the foraminifera.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 55, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2023AM-393951
© Copyright 2023 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.