T224 Advances in Managed Aquifer Recharge

Wednesday, 18 October 2023
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
319

SULFUR HEXAFLUORIDE ACCUMULATION IN GROUNDWATERS IN SHELBY COUNTY, TENNESSEE

Paper number: T224-14
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 11:10 AM – 11:25 AM

Authors

Abstract

Sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) has garnered keen interest as a hydrologic tracer because of its low reactivity, low adsorption to organics and soils, and its presumed low likelihood of arising from sources other than the atmosphere. Concentrations of SF6 in the atmosphere have been well documented over the past sixty years, though limited documentation exists before that time. As a result, SF6 is considered an excellent tracer for detecting modern groundwater (< 40 years old). This kind of tracer is particularly valuable in Shelby County, Tennessee, as it has been used to determine mixing of modern recharge waters with groundwater and to evaluate the vulnerability of municipal groundwater supplies.

This study evaluates current sampling methods and analytical procedures, proposes a new sampling method, and suggests multiple sources of SF6 accumulation in groundwaters in Shelby County, Tennessee. The first part of the study determines whether sampling error is a dominant component of SF6 concentrations by sampling nine wells screened in the Memphis aquifer in Shelby County using conventional methods as well as a newly developed airtight methodology. The samples taken using both methods were analyzed at the Dissolved Gas Lab at the University of Utah and the Groundwater Dating Lab at the US Geological Survey in Reston, Virginia. Results from these geochemical analyses suggest the airtight sampling method may eliminate potential re-equilibration with ambient air and improve analytical consistency compared to the conventional sampling method.

In addition, this study also presents a historical analysis of geochemical trends using samples collected from approximately 100 production wells in Shelby County during the past 13 years. The historical analysis will be used to compare SF6 and tritium/tritiogenic helium-3 (3H /3He) derived ages for consistency and to assess discrepancies that may have been caused by sampling and analytical error, possible terrigenic sources of SF6, and possible water re-equilibration sources of SF6. Samples with large statistical variance between SF6 and 3H/3He derived ages as well as near-surface water interaction may indicate the prevalence of more than one SF6 source (terrigenic, modern water, or ambient air) in historical samples collected in Shelby County.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 55, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2023AM-395258

© Copyright 2023 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.