T55 These Old Mountains Still Got It: Natural Hazards of the Evolving Appalachian Mountain Belt

Sunday, 15 October 2023
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
317 / 318

THE ISOTOPIC SIGNATURE OF LANDSLIDES: MODELING THE EFFECT OF VARYING LANDSLIDING RATES ON THE IN SITU 14C AND 10BE COSMOGENIC NUCLIDE CONCENTRATIONS

Paper number: T55-10
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 3:45 PM – 4:00 PM

Authors

Abstract

In steep mountains, landslide activity regulates sediment delivery from hillslopes into the fluvial network, influencing the degree to which landscapes record tectonic and climatic forcings, and ultimately controlling the extent and persistence of soils. However, the dynamics of steep hillslopes characterized by stochastic transport events is difficult to fully capture at geologically-relevant timescales, hampering our predictions of hazard potential and regolith dynamics in tectonically active regions. We formulate a numerical model that evolves a synthetic landscape that combines steady (i.e., soil creep), and stochastic (i.e., landslides) erosional processes that occur at user-defined rates to understand how these parameters modulate soil thickness on hillslopes and predict the resulting in-situ 14C-10Be disequilibrium in detrital sands. Our modeling results indicate that: (i) 14C provides a more sensitive tool than 10Be to address long-term erosion rates in landslide-dominated catchments, provided that floodplain sediment storage is negligible, (ii) there is no systematic relationship between drainage area and 10Be-derived denudation rates, consistent with empirical studies performed over the last decades, (iii) varying landsliding rates define distinct domains in the 10Be vs 14C/10Be space, allowing us to infer millennial-scale landsliding rates from 14C and 10Be measurements in detrital sands collected from landslide-prone regions, and (iv) under a broad combination of stochastic and steady erosion rates, soils may never reach steady-state thicknesses and thus soil production rates measured at the regolith-bedrock interface are likely to produce incorrect estimates. Taken together, these results support our modeling scheme, illustrate the advantages of combining 14C-10Be to understand tectonically-active landscapes, and provide fresh insights for studies aiming to query landslide-dominated regions. More importantly, the results raise the following questions: is there a functional relationship between rates of landsliding and (steady-state) erosion? If so, what form does it take?

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 55, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2023AM-395409

© Copyright 2023 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.