37 Trace Elements in the Environment

Tuesday, 19 March 2024
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Merrimack Room

ASSESSING EXPECTED ANALYTE DISTRIBUTIONS USING LOGRATIO TRANSFORMATION, MAHALANOBIS DISTANCE EVALUATION AND SOIL PHYSICAL PROPERTIES: AN EXAMPLE FROM A FARM SOIL DATASET

Paper number: 37-11
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 11:00 AM – 11:20 AM

Authors

  • James Ridenour Presenting Author
    Center of Environmental Health, Bureau of Toxic Substance Assessment, Albany, NY

Abstract

Standard approaches for defining outliers as used with conventional datasets are potentially problematic for concentration data, because these methods remain rooted in geometries that are not descriptive of concentration space. Concentrations are one example of “compositions”, which convey information on the relative abundance (proportions) of the constituent parts. They (and other kinds of compositional data) occupy a constrained sample space with different properties than the Euclidean space for which conventional statistical methods are derived. This also holds implications for conventionally derived measures of “typical” concentrations or ranges for individual analytes, as atypical cases can go unrecognized when constituent parts comprising compositional datasets are evaluated as independent variables. Although some remain unaware of these issues, tools specifically designed for working with compositional data have been available since the 1980s. The application of compositional methods to appropriately distinguish typical (“core”) from nonrepresentative multipart cases (after which familiar methods are used to describe the single part distributions for these groups) is demonstrated with an Exploratory Data Analysis of a New York State farm soil dataset. The analysis also recognizes the soil textural classes of the samples as a relevant factor impacting the initial analyte distributions. Accounting for soil texture differences and applying relevant approaches developed for investigating compositional data are both important considerations in applications seeking to define background soil levels and other prevalence-based descriptive comparison values.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 1

doi: 10.1130/abs/2024NE-396864

© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.