26 D8. Paleontology (Posters)
Monday, 15 April 2024
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Grand Ballroom
IS THERE PREDATORY DRILLHOLE SITE STEREOTYPY IN THE MIOCENE ST. MARY’S FORMATION?
Paper number: 26-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:30 PM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Frank ForcinoWestern Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC
-
Emily S. StaffordWestern Carolina University, Cullowhee, NC
Abstract
Drillhole frequencies (DHF) were similar among the three taxa: Ilyanassa (n=958) had a DHF of 0.46, Mangelia(n=415) had a DHF of 0.42, and Naticids (n=143) had a DHF of 0.41. Both Ilyanassa and naticids were preferentially drilled on the abapertural side on the second whorl. Previous research has found that drillhole location may depend on the size and prey shell and the predator’s handling behavior. Drilling on the apertural side may be preferred since the predator’s foot seals off the prey aperture, blocking escape. This may be the case with Ilyanassa and naticid prey. Mangelia tends to be smaller than the other prey taxa. The abapertural hole locations may indicate that the naticid predators had to grapple Mangelia differently than larger prey, perhaps because the small Mangelia was more able to escape from the apertural position.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 2
doi: 10.1130/abs/2024SE-397909
© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.