53 Cores and Rocks from the Southeast Atlantic Continental Margin to Facilitate Interstate Correlation of Along-Strike Units: A Hands-On Poster Session to Support Symposium 2 (Posters)
Tuesday, 16 April 2024
2:30 PM - 5:30 PM
Top of the Plaza
USE OF GEOCHRONOLOGICAL TECHNIQUES TO CONSTRAIN GEOLOGICAL RECORDS FROM POCKOY ISLAND, S.C.: PHYSICAL SAMPLES AND DISCUSSION
Paper number: 53-2
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 2:30 PM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Katherine LucianoSouth Carolina Geological Survey, Charleston, SC
-
M. HarrisCollege of Charleston, Charleston, SC
-
Tammy RittenourUtah State University, Logan, UT
Abstract
The choice of sampling interval and confidence of depositional facies interpretations is critical to the interpretation of geochronological data. Using the Central Age Model of Galbraith and Roberts (2012), correction for fading (Auclair 2003), and the correction model of Huntley and Lamothe (2001), the IRSL data supplied a range of late Pleistocene MIS 4 to 3 ages (69.99 +/- 7.37 to 54.16 +/- 5.57 ka). Those calculated ages provide a variety of interpretations for isostatic adjustment and relative sea-level position, or for differences in facies interpretation.
Sample PI_01 (66.76 +/- 8.31 ka; 1.93-2.32 m depth, +0.44- +0.05 m elev) is the most seaward with PI_02 (54.16 +/-5.57 ka; 1.73-2.08 m depth, -0.28- -0.63 m elev) being more landward and PI_03 (62.65 +/- 8.05 ka; 1.40-1.70 m depth, +0.11- -0.19 m elev) being most landward on Pockoy Island. PI_04 (69.99 +/-7.37 ka; 1.40-1.70 m depth, +0.14- -0.16 m elev) was collected on the small hammock island between Pockoy and Edisto. While the ages with their +/- 2ơ’s mostly overlap, PI_04’s age is mostly likely somewhat older, which is expected from geographic position.
We present one of the four cores as a representative example to allow lithologic examination. This will facilitate discussion of the choice of sample interval and facies assignment. The facies assignment, selection of the sampled interval, and geochronologic age have implications of stratigraphic correlations in other coastal locations in the southeastern U.S.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 2
doi: 10.1130/abs/2024SE-398410
© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.