20 The Boring Billion was not so Boring! Mesoproterozoic Tectonics, Sedimentation, and Geochronology of Northwest Laurentia I

Thursday, 16 May 2024
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
Cedar Ballroom

TIMING OF MIDDLE PROTEROZOIC MINERALIZATION AND MAGMATISM IN THE HELENA EMBAYMENT OF THE BELT BASIN

Paper number: 20-13
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 11:40 AM – 12:00 PM

Authors

Abstract

The Middle Proterozoic Newland Formation in the Helena Embayment (Lower Belt, Belt Supergroup) consists of dolomitic and calcareous micro-turbidites and turbidites, with subordinate sub-wavebase deposits of limestone, dolomite, non-calcareous shale, conglomerate and calcarenite. The Newland Fm. contains many stratabound sulfide deposits which contain a measured and indicated resource of 10.9 Mt containing 2.9% Cu and an inferred resource of 11 Mt containing 2.5% Cu. The most numerous deposits cluster near the northern margin of the Helena Embayment. A Re-Os date on chalcopyrite (Saintilan, et. al. 2021), which overprints beds of pyrite in the deposits, provides a crystallization date of 1488 Ma +/- 34 Ma. This date, together with a cassiterite date of 1475 +/- 4 Ma from the Sullivan Pb-Zn-Ag deposit (Slack, 2020) suggests a prolonged period of widespread subaqueous hydrothermal activity in the Belt basin during Lower Belt time. Detrital zircons from Newland Fm. and earlier Lower Belt sediments show a probable separate sediment source area from that for detrital zircons from the Greyson Fm. and the middle Prichard Fm. Fresh zircon from a group of volcanic tuff(?) beds in the Newland Fm. give a U-Pb date of 1485 +/- 3.3 Ma supported by a 1483 +/- 5 Ma date on an andesite dike that cuts the Newland Fm. in the same area. Taken together, the above-described features suggest a complex depocenter configuration for the Belt Basin in Lower Belt time with synchronous volcanic and hydrothermal activity. Such features record a basin wide common magmatic event during initial basin formation that provided heat energy to drive hydrothermal waters to the subaqueous hotsprings fields at Sullivan, Black Butte, and other locations which resulted in several giant sulfide deposits.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 4

doi: 10.1130/abs/2024CD-399440

© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.