T213 Geoscience and Hydrology of Your Public Lands: STEM Internships, Research, Science, Mapping, Resource Management, and Education

Tuesday, 24 September 2024
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
209A

USING MACHINE LEARNING TO CLASSIFY LANDSCAPE DISTURBANCES IN PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL PARKS

Paper number: T213-9
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 3:15 PM – 3:30 PM

Authors

  • Daniel Wexler Presenting Author
    Scientists in Parks, Vienna, VA
  • John Boetsch
    North Coast and Cascades Inventory and Monitoring Network, Port Angeles, WA
  • Natasha Antonova
    North Coast and Cascades Inventory and Monitoring Network, Port Angeles, WA

Abstract

Landscape ­disturbances drive ecological change by facilitating succession, maintain the overall health of ecosystems by cycling nutrients, and sometimes impact human infrastructure. To track disturbance through time and space, the National Park Service uses Landsat imagery and the LandTrendr algorithm to identify patches of land that have experienced disturbance in three parks in the Pacific Northwest. This study presents a process for training and tuning a random forest machine learning model that can automate labeling these patches in Mount Rainier National Park, Olympic National Park, and North Cascades National Park Service Complex with one of eight disturbance classes (annual variability, avalanche, blowdown, clearing, defoliation, fire, mass movement, and riparian change). A separate model was built for each park due to the unique nature of the different areas, and each model was trained on an extensive dataset of human-labeled disturbance patches from 1987-2023. We introduce a novel way of evaluating the tree voting outputs of the random forest models to allow the user to individually optimize the classification error for each disturbance class against a trade-off of having to manually label more or fewer disturbance patches. To perform this optimization, the models were tested using a withheld, labeled dataset. Preliminary random forest models showed that classifications made with a higher percentage of decision tree votes were more likely to be correct. After thresholding by decision tree vote cutoffs, 99.6% of the patches at Mount Rainier were labeled with 97.5% accuracy, 87.8% of the patches at Olympic were labeled with 95.7% accuracy, and 73.3% of the patches at North Cascades were labeled with 95.8% accuracy. We plan to further validate these results with an additional human review of a subset of the patches labeled by the model to estimate final classification error rates. This approach may be broadly applicable for assessing model performance on individual disturbance classes to balance high accuracy against the need to automate map classifications across large landscapes.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-400226

© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.