T89 The Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) Boundary Interval: From Large-scale Geological Events to Mass Extinction Mechanisms
Monday, 23 September 2024
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
204C
REDUCED CO2 RELEASE FROM THE CHICXULUB IMPACT EVENT AS INFERRED FROM CARBONATE CLUMPED ISOTOPE THERMOMETRY ON CRATER IMPACTITES
Paper number: T89-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:30 AM – 9:45 AM
Authors
-
Marta MarchegianoVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels
-
Marta MarchegianoUniversity of Granada, Granada
-
Marion PeralVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels
-
Marion PeralUniversité de Bordeaux, PESSAC CEDEX
-
Steven GoderisVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels
-
Nadine MattielliUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels
-
Philippe ClaeysVrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels
Abstract
Three scenarios are introduced to explain the high temperatures. 1) Outside the Chicxulub crater, the proximal ejecta blanket shows traces of thermal processing of carbonate material during ejection (>100°C). 2) Within the crater the influence of a widespread hydrothermal system is determined in all lithologies (>35.5°C) except post-impact sediments. 3) Superimposed on a burial diagenetic and a hydrothermal overprint, highly elevated temperatures (up to 327 ± 33°C) in lower suevites and impact melt rocks are measured in microcrystalline calcite phases. This calcite resembles microcrystalline petrographic features produced by laser-melting experiments on limestones. We interpret that these features likely formed by impact-induced decarbonation and rapid back-reaction, in which highly reactive CaO recombines with impact-released CO2 to form secondary CaCO3 phases.
Our dataset provides the first physical and chemical evidence for back-reactions deep within the Chicxulub impact structure. This has important climatic implications for the Cretaceous-Paleogene (K-Pg) mass extinction event, as current numerical models likely overestimate CO2-release from the Chicxulub impact, potentially up to a factor of ~60%. Therefore, the recombination effect to form secondary CaCO3 phases needs to be accounted for in these paleoclimate models.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-402742
© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.