T176 Science and Technology Advancement in Responsible Mining of Critical Minerals from Primary and Secondary Resources (Posters)

Tuesday, 24 September 2024
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Hall D

CRITICAL MINERALS IN MINE WASTE: ENRICHMENT AND DEPORTMENT OF CRITICAL MINERALS IN GANGUE PYRITE AND PYRRHOTITE FROM VOLCANOGENIC MASSIVE SULFIDES

Paper number: T176-9
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 5:30 PM

Authors

  • Kathryn Hobart Presenting Author
    Geology, Energy, and Minerals Science Center, Reston, VA
  • Nadine M. Piatak
    Geology, Energy, and Minerals Science Center, Reston, VA
  • Robert Seal
    Geology, Energy, and Minerals Science Center, Reston, VA
  • Jay Thompson
    Geology, Geophysics, and Geochemistry Science Center, Denver, CO

Abstract

Mine waste could be an untapped source of critical mineral (CM) resources, but evaluating their potential requires understanding the mineralogical deportment of potentially valuable commodities. Gangue minerals, such as pyrite (Py, FeS2) and pyrrhotite (Po, Fe1-xS), may host CMs but are typically viewed as waste and separated during ore processing. The goal of this project is to link the concentrations and mineralogical deportment of CMs hosted in gangue Py and Po. Determining a link between CM concentrations in Py and Po and deposit type will allow these relationships to be used as a screening tool to identify and prioritize prospective mine waste "deposits”.

Gangue sulfide minerals from volcanogenic massive sulfide (VMS) mine tailings were used as a test case due to their high sulfide mineral content and geologic diversity. VMS deposits are classified by the associated volcanic and sedimentary host rocks, which range from mafic to felsic. The primary commodities and ore minerals vary, but these deposits generally contain >40% sulfides by mass. Ore minerals make up between 10 to 20% of that total, with the remainder, primarily Py and Po, partitioning into mine wastes. We analyzed sixteen flotation mill tailings samples from VMS mines to determine bulk mineralogy and chemistry. Subsequently, Py and Po grains from the tailings samples and an additional 13 ore samples (5 from the same deposit as a tailings sample) were analyzed by SEM, EMPA, and LA-ICP-MS to determine the concentration and distribution of CMs.

CM concentrations vary by both deposit type and among grains within samples. Although the mean Py- and Po-associated CM concentrations are consistent with bulk chemistry CM concentrations of the tailings, there is variability in individual grain measurements, likely due to elements occurring in both solid solution and as discrete mineral inclusions, highlighting the diversity of potential enrichment mechanisms. Py and Po from tailings and ore samples from the same deposit express the similar enrichment in CMs, suggesting that CMs hosted in Py and Po consistently report to the tailings. Py from bimodal-mafic deposits have the highest concentrations of cobalt (Co), while most Po have Co concentrations below the limit of detection. Conversely, both Py and Po from mafic-ultramafic and siliciclastic-mafic deposits have approximately the same median Co concentration.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-403209

© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.