T253 Ore Genesis in Extensional Tectonic Environments (Posters)
Wednesday, 25 September 2024
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Hall D
CONTRASTING STYLES OF SILICIFICATION IN TWO COALESCING, DUCTILE-ROOTED DETACHMENT FAULTS, WHITE PINE RANGE, EAST-CENTRAL NEVADA; IMPLICATIONS FOR ORE GENESIS
Paper number: T253-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Gregory HolkCalifornia State Univ Long Beach, Long Beach, CA
Abstract
The White Pine detachment (WPD) has been mapped over most of the White Pine and Grant Ranges, and in adjacent Railroad Valley (>3,000 km2; Francis and Walker, 2001). The WPD is rooted in the Mississippian Chainman Shale, which cuts section in the lower plate as far down as Cambrian; it is associated with breccia and widespread isolated ledges of jasperoid. The jasperoid is mostly microcrystalline or “jigsaw” quartz, with accessory chalcedony. Carbonate features such as fossils and stylolites are preserved. The jasperoid is brecciated locally, with interclast late milky or drusy quartz. The fabric is massive; veining is unimportant. The Gold Point Mine shows visible flakes of gold in jasperoid.
The Currant Gap detachment (CGD) is rooted in the argillaceous Cambrian Lincoln Peak formation, which is exposed only in a small 19 km2 area in the southern White Pine Range. The fault is exposed on a hillside as a wall of almost pure quartz 40 m thick and 1.7 km long, called by us the “spine.” This is in contrast to the jasperoid ledges in the WPD, which are separated by other lithologies in the fault zone. Moreover, veining appears to be the dominant mode of emplacement in the CGD. Jigsaw quartz texture in the CGD is subordinate to reticulated and granular texture; fossils are not preserved. We have not observed chalcedony in the CGD.
A cross section from the Gold Point Mine to the spine shows that the two detachments coalesce here. Elsewhere up to 4,000 feet of Cambrian to Devonian strata separate the WPD from the presumed CGD at depth. The disparate textures, field relations, mineral occurrences, and differing oxygen isotopic signatures, suggest that silica in the WPD was emplaced along gel fronts, while quartz in the CGD crystallized from fluid in carbonate primary pore spaces and in fractures to form veins (Holk et al., in press). We consider that the disparate modes of emplacement, and presence of mineralization only in the WPD, is due to disparate sources of hydrothermal fluids, and different migration paths along the detachments.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-403754
© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.