T200 New Mapping and Interpretation of the Geology of the Sierra Nevada, California and Nevada, United States (Posters)
Tuesday, 24 September 2024
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Hall D
IOCG AND IOA DEPOSIT SIGNATURES IN LIGHTS CREEK STOCK BY MAGNETITE CHEMISTRY VIA RANDOM FOREST ALGORITHM
Paper number: T200-9
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Robin DonatelloCalifornia State University, Chico, Chico, CA
-
Hannah AirdCalifornia State University, Chico, Chico, CA
Abstract
Magnetite is abundant in both IOCG and IOA deposits, forming under magmatic conditions and various hydrothermal conditions (sodic-calcic, potassic alteration). As a result, magnetite geochemistry has been commonly used in binary plots to discriminate between different deposit types. However, binary plots are limited in dimension and can plot iron oxides from a single deposit into a wide range of deposit types, thus having a low general accuracy. With many iron oxide distinguishing plots available, using machine learning to differentiate between IOA and IOCG has been shown to give a higher classification accuracy based on EPMA data.
For this study, a random forest algorithm (RF) was trained in R using a dataset containing over 1,100 samples from 24 known deposits from previous studies. The RF had a classification accuracy of 0.87 and was able to correctly identify 23 of the 24 deposits correctly. Contrary to the findings of previous studies, this model indicates that not only V but also Al are key elements in distinguishing between the two deposit types, with IOAs having a lower amount of Al and higher V than IOCGs. Concentrations of Mg, Mn were moderately significant, with Si and Ti being less.
The Lights Creek Stock in Plumas County, CA, historically seen as a Cu porphyry and recently reclassified as IOCG, hosts three deposits within a granitoid host rock: Superior and Engels (magnetite-dominated) and Moonlight (hematite-dominated). The testing dataset used 36 samples from the Superior mine and classified 20 of 36 samples having an IOA signature. Of those 20 IOA signature samples, 17 are stratigraphically deeper than the 16 IOCG signature samples. This indicates that the Superior deposit is a complex system which could be a transitional area between an IOA and IOCG system. Future work will incorporate iron oxide compositions from Engels and Moonlight deposits to give a clearer understanding of the relationship between the three deposits.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-404268
© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.