T5 Innovations in Geological Mapping

Sunday, 22 September 2024
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
206B

PALAEO-RECONSTRUCTION (OR PLATE RECONSTRUCTION) MODELLING OF SUPERCONTINENT CYCLICITY, WITH APPLICATIONS TO UNDERSTANDING AND VISUALISING DEEP TIME EARTH HISTORY

Paper number: T5-6
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:15 AM – 9:30 AM

Authors

Abstract

The concept of supercontinent cyclicity is embedded in the geoscience literature although the exact extent, constitution, arrangement of the ‘building blocks’ and of how much crust needs to be amalgamated to be considered a supercontinent (all, most or some specific proportion) remains debated.

Many global palaeo-reconstruction models are now available ranging from Phanerozoic into the Proterozoic with one (in development) extending back to the Archaean. These models provide an opportunity to develop methodology to quantify the proportion of continent crust present within each supercontinent while also allowing one to quantitatively compare the predictions of different models. To avoid confusion between geological interpretations and model-dependent associations, we term the model ‘building blocks’ geodynamic units (GDUs), and we consider only GDUs representing continental crust. Amalgamations of GDUs are named SuperGDUs - digital twins for geological supercontinents and smaller crustal amalgamations (proximal accumulations with no internal relative motion).

Using our methodology, we compare four reconstruction models, ranging in maximum age from ~1.8 to ~3.0Ga and containing from ~150 to ~2700 GDUs. Parallel processing is required to achieve variations at 5 Ma age increments. Automated delineation of concave hull shapes is so inconsistent that the only feasible approach to quantify amalgamation is based on area.

All models exhibit similar amalgamation percentages, relative to total modelled continental crust at the time. Pangaea is clearly identified and more nuanced models distinguish amalgamation of Gondwana prior to accretion of Laurussia. Similar relative proportions of continental crust are evident for Rodinia, Nuna and a Kenorland-like situation. Older reconstructed amalgamations are variable due to poor constraints on possible configurations and the limited preservation of Archaean crust. A cutoff of ~55% seems appropriate for definition of a primary (single largest) SuperGDU and hence a supercontinent.

Derivation of amalgamations of multiple GDUs into subordinate SuperGDUs further provides benefits for the computation and visualisation of associated data, the automatic process of identifying plate boundaries and other geodynamic features controlling ore deposits through deep time and the future application of machine learning.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-404962

© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.