T154 Geologic Energy Resources and Storage for Now and the Future

Tuesday, 24 September 2024
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
207C

COMPARING BOTTOM-HOLE TEMPERATURE CORRECTION METHODOLOGIES IN THE MESOZOIC STRATA OF SOUTH TEXAS FOR TEMPERATURE-DEPTH MAPPING AND GEOTHERMAL PLAY TYPE IDENTIFICATION

Paper number: T154-11
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:25 AM – 10:40 AM

Authors

Abstract

Bottom-hole temperature (BHT) measurements from well logs are an abundant data set in sedimentary basins but are also notoriously unreliable because of several reasons associated with their acquisition. These reasons include the vintage of the measurement, type of tool used, ambient surface temperature at the time of logging, thermal properties of the drilling mud, time since circulation (TSC), rate of penetration (ROP) while drilling, human error, and the thermal conductivity of the formation and formation fluids (oil, natural gas, or brine) where the temperature is measured. Consequently, BHT correction methods vary depending on the basin and available data.

For this project, four different correction methodologies were applied to a dataset of 272 wells in south Texas with BHT measurements in Mesozoic formations. Each of these wells also have digital well logs, TSC data, BHT measurements and their associated depths, and the ambient surface temperature at the time of logging. Depths for these BHT measurements range from approximately 6,000 ft to 24,000 ft and uncorrected temperatures range from 145⁰ F to 435⁰ F. Using the Waples correction method resulted in an average increase in BHT of 19.66% and the Forster method had a similar average temperature increase of 20.49%. The SMU-Harrison and Kehle correction formulas resulted in an average temperature increase of 12.44% and 14.86% respectively.

To calibrate the accuracy of these different correction methods, temperature measurements from 10 cement bond logs (CBLs) and 22 cased-hole temperature logs for these wells was compared to the corrected temperatures values. Between 6,000 ft and 12,000 ft, corrected BHT measurements from each method fall within the trend of calibration temperatures from both CBLs and cased-hole temperature logs. However, below 12,000 ft, the Waples and Forster methods tend to calculate higher temperatures compared to the CBLs and cased-hole temperature logs. These two methods appear to be overestimating the temperature at deeper depths, while the SMU-Harrison and Kehle methods may be underestimating temperatures in the deeper parts of the basin. Consequently, developing intra-basin specific BHT correction methods may be necessary to correct for geologic and drilling variables that affect the true formation temperature, which is a pivotal part of geothermal exploration in sedimentary basins.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5

doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-405062

© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.