T254 Mineralogy, Geochemistry, Petrology, and Volcanology Student Session (Posters)
Wednesday, 25 September 2024
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Hall D
PRELIMINARY GEOCHEMICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF SOME HYDROCARBON PRODUCING INTERVALS IN KANSAS
Paper number: T254-8
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 5:30 PM
Authors
-
Henry AgbogunFort Hays State University, Hays, KS
-
Wahid RahmanImpac Exploration Services, Houston, TX
Abstract
Based on the GC results, the Carbon Preference Index (CPI) was calculated to be 1.0 for all samples except one ARB sample from the CKU with a CPI of 0.9. The Pristane/Phytane (Pr/Ph) ratio for the samples ranged from 1.3 to 1.6 except for one ARB sample from the CKU that showed 0.9. The naphthenes to alkanes (NP/AK) ratio of samples ranged from 0.01 to 0.24 except for one ARB sample from the CKU that showed 0.50. The evaluated CPI, Pr/Ph, and NP/AK all suggest a shale lithology for the source rock that generated the hydrocarbons from the different intervals. A plot of Pr/n-C17 and Ph/n-C18 ratios showed six samples were deposited at the margin of marine and transitional environments while one ARB sample from the CKU and the SMS sample from the FCB were deposited in a marine environment. The organic matter input for the samples was interpreted to be marine-sourced based on Pr/Ph < 2 and low n-C21 to n-C35 ranging (5 to 29 %) for all the samples. An examination of the gas chromatograms for all the samples showed that the persistently outlying ARB sample and the SMS sample from the FCB were characterized by multimodal distributions and severe stripping of long-chain carbon atoms, thereby suggesting biodegradation.
Hierarchical cluster analysis using calculated parameters (Pr/Ph, Pr/n-C17, Ph/n-C18, n-C18/n-C19, n-C17/n-C29, CPI) and the amounts of n-alkanes, branched alkanes, naphthenes, aromatics, and isoprenoids revealed four distinct groups: Group 1 (three LKC and two ARB from the CKU), Group 2 (one SMS from the CKU), Group 3 (one ARB from the CKU), and Group 4 (one SMS from the FCB). Groups 3 and 4 are interpreted to be due to different degrees of biodegradation while Groups 1 and 2 are interpreted to be due to producing interval distinctions.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-405419
© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.