204 D10. Recent Advances in Biogeography/Biostratigraphy and Diversity, Extinction, and Origination
Tuesday, 24 September 2024
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
207D
PALEOBOTANICAL OVERVIEW OF THE NESLEN FORMATION (LATE CRETACEOUS: CAMPANIAN) FROM THE BOOK CLIFFS OF EASTERN UTAH
Paper number: 204-13
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:15 PM – 4:30 PM
Authors
-
Joshua LivelyUtah State University Eastern, Price, UT
-
S. Augusta MaccrackenDenver Museum Nature & Science, Denver, CO
Abstract
In this contribution, we provide a paleobotanical overview of the Neslen Formation and identify plant fossils from localities previously collected by the Prehistoric Museum at Utah State University Eastern and the Denver Museum of Nature & Science. Approximately 500 fossil plant specimens have been analyzed and most have been morphotyped. Plant fossils were discovered in fine-grained sandstones, coalified shales, and mudstones using both traditional quarrying and surface collection techniques. Fossil leaves are classified using the morphotyping system. The paleobotanical diversity of this formation is growing, with two quarries containing over 30 morphotypes each.
So far, we have identified over 40 plant morphotypes from the formation. We identified multiple polypodipsoida, including Equisetum, an aquatic fern in the genus Hydropteris, and at least three other fern morphotypes. Gymnosperms include the genera Metasequoia, Araucaria, and Protodammara. Though many localities consist of over 60% gymnosperms, two recently discovered sites are dominated by angiosperm fossils. Angiosperms are a diverse component of the flora in the Neslen Formation, with both terrestrial and aquatic taxa present. These include the floating aquatic monocot Cobbania, the palm Sabalites, and the terrestrial dicot “Ficus” planicostata. Those taxa are commonly found in other Laramidian floras as well. Other identifiable genera include Paleoaster, Paleonelumbo, Brassenites, and Gunnera. Overall, preservation of plants within the Neslen Formation is patchy and rare. Inconsistencies in preservation raise questions about plant transport and preservation bias within the formation across different groups of plants.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 56, No. 5
doi: 10.1130/abs/2024AM-405581
© Copyright 2024 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.