5 Undergraduate Research Poster Session I

Friday, 28 March 2025
8:30 AM - 5:30 PM
North Great Hall

ELECTROMAGNETIC INDUCTION FOR POINT BAR ANALYSIS ALONG THE GREAT MIAMI RIVER AT HERITAGE PARK, COLERAIN TOWNSHIP, HAMILTON COUNTY, OHIO

Paper number: 5-29
Program: Theme Sessions
Time: 8:30 AM – 5:30 PM

Authors

Abstract

The Great Miami River runs alongside Heritage Park in Colerain Township, Hamilton County, Ohio. According to FEMA, this area is classified as a high-risk flood zone, with historically significant floods in 1913 and 1959. Major floods can change the river’s flow path, altering point bars and compound bars. For this project, we sought to analyze the stratigraphy of a point bar along the river using electromagnetic induction (EMI). This technique allows for the imaging of the EMI properties of the point bar sediments, enabling a better understanding of point bar development and sediment distribution. Spatial variability of sediment types within a point bar is crucial to understand, as it can be used to evaluate the interactions between groundwater and surface water and, ultimately, how river systems transport contaminants.

Data were collected along 18 transects using a DUALEM-412, which has three pairs of dual-geometry sensors located at 1, 2, and 4 meters along its length. This allows for the electromagnetic imaging of six depths of investigation whose thickness is dependent on the sediment matrix being surveyed. The survey was done by walking E-W transects along the bar's long axis, spaced 5m apart. N-S crosslines were done with 20m spacing. Three Wenner array resistivity surveys with 1, 3, and 5 m a spacing were collected to help with data inversion. Raw data were trimmed to remove outliers, processed and inverted in Resipy. Modeling results were contoured using kriging in Surfer.

We interpret that the current point bar overlays sediment from an older channel of the Great Miami River. At the survey site, larger, well-established cobbles were cut by a swath of fine-grained sediment, most prominently along the northern part of the point bar. Lower conductivity readings at the larger cobbles, coupled with higher conductivities within the finer sediments, point to a recent filling of a former smaller channel. Looking forward, a survey with closer passes could be conducted to create a more accurate inversion of the dataset. Also, other programs, such as EMagPy, could be used to process both surveys to verify the results obtained.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 57, No. 3

doi: 10.1130/abs/2025NE-407484

© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.