11 Geoscience Education in the Western U.S and México. Practices, Pathways, and Partnerships.
Promotes the exchange of educational practices, and collaborations between U.S.A. and México to strengthen geoscience education, fostering academic networks, pedagogical innovation, and collaborative training for students and faculty.
Wednesday, 22 April 2026
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
LMH, Deli
Increasing the Value of Observational Datasets in Digital Data Systems through Critical Outcrops
Paper number: 11-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 2:55 PM – 3:15 PM
Authors
-
Thomas ShipleyTemple University, Philadelphia, PA
-
Basil TikoffStraboSpot Data System
-
Ellen NelsonUniversity of Wisconsin– Madison, Madison, WI
-
Cristina WilsonOregon State University
-
Terry PavlisUniversity of Texas, Taos, NM
-
Sarah RoeskeUniversity of California, Davis, CA
-
Nikki SeymourOccidental College, Los Angeles, CA
-
Trevor WaldienSouth Dakota School of Mines & Technology, Rapid City, SD
-
Michael WellsUniversity of Nevada, Las Vegas, NV
Abstract
Digital geologic data collection provides the opportunity to transition science practice to a workflow in which data is collected and stored by groups and/or reused by others: This approach affords inclusivity and provides the ability to work at the interfaces between sub-disciplines. The challenge of this approach is to record public data in a way that provides information about context, including its quality and importance, that would allow insights by someone who had not collected the data.
We introduce the concept of a critical outcrop, which is an outcrop of particular importance in a field area, as a possible key to effectively sharing large digital field datasets for public use and collaboration. There are four different types of critical outcrops: Exemplar, Confuser, Disambiguator, and Anchor. Each type of critical outcrop is salient (important) to the resultant models, but in different ways. Critical outcrops were often chosen because they closely reflected an outcrop or relationship that had been seen somewhere else in the world. Thus, the choice of critical outcrops indicates that analogical thinking is actively being used by practitioners. Reporting on critical outcrops – and the analogy that is being made to other field areas – will greatly facilitate science communication and more robust scientific interpretations. Moreover, providing a higher level of supplied information increases trust among participating scientists, and thus increases trust in entire datasets.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 58, No. 3
doi: 10.1130/abs/2026CD-410937
© Copyright 2026 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.