57 Advances and Applications in Geochronology for Interpreting Stratigraphic and Basin Records, Part II
This session welcomes submissions related to applications of geochronology (e.g., U-Pb, 40Ar/39Ar) in stratigraphic research, including topics such as eruption and maximum depositional age estimation, provenance analysis, numerical modeling of geochronological data, and multi-disciplinary chronostratigraphic characterization.
Sunday, 19 October 2025
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
HBGCC, 304C
Intercalibrating Geochronometers Into the Future
Paper number: 57-2
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 1:55 PM – 2:10 PM
Authors
-
Leah MorganUSGS, Denver, CO
-
Jack CarterBerkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, CA
-
Courtney SprainUniversity of Florida, Gainesville, FL
-
Andrew TholtUC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
-
Anthony FuentesUC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
-
Caroline HaslerUC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA
-
Brian JichaUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Middleton, WI
-
Brenhin KellerDartmouth College, Hanover, NH
-
Paul RenneBerkeley Geochronology Center, Berkeley, CA
-
Mark SchmitzBoise State University, Boise, ID
-
Blair SchoenePrinceton University, Princeton, NJ
Abstract
The intercalibration of geochronologic systems is vital for advancing geochronology in stratigraphic research. The 40Ar/39Ar and U-Pb dating methods are commonly employed, either in tandem or independently, to determine eruption and depositional ages. When utilizing multiple chronometers, as well as in contexts where absolute ages are crucial (e.g. geologic timescale calibration) the accurate calibration and intercalibration of these systems becomes especially paramount.
Recent work by Carter et al. (2025) used a Bayesian approach to calibrate the 40K decay scheme and the 40Ar*/40K composition of Fish Canyon sanidine (FCs); the model relies on priors including decay constants for 40K, 238U, and 235U, as well as a series of complementary 40Ar/39Ar and U-Pb datasets from geological samples (including offset parameters to account for various age-perturbing phenomena). This approach has been effective in enhancing the accuracy of the 40Ar/39Ar system and may similarly be employed to benefit the U-Pb system.
As we look to the future, this group of co-authors includes an advisory committee to explore further enhancements to the Bayesian model and to identify effective strategies for the ongoing refinement of geochronometer intercalibration. In upcoming iterations of the model, we plan to incorporate additional geological samples (young and old samples are particularly useful). We also aim to accommodate variable 238U/235U ratios and initial U-series disequilibrium in zircon U-Pb analyses. Furthermore, we are working on integrating a Bayesian approach to recognize and obviate pre-eruptive residence times of zircons and sanidines (Keller 2023). We are also considering the incorporation of other geochronometers (e.g. U-series and radiocarbon). We acknowledge the community's need for stability in parameter values while also emphasizing the importance of continually refining their accuracy, precision and intercalibration. We elicit suggestions from the geochronology community as we move forward with future updates to the Bayesian model.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 57, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2025AM-412719
© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.