280 Planetary Exploration and Education: How We Learn About Our Solar System and Beyond
This session links how we teach and learn about the solar system to how we have gained that information (i.e., space missions). Descriptions of teaching activities/courses, and strategies for working with students are encouraged.
Wednesday, 22 October 2025
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
HBGCC, 214B
Thermal and Physical Properties of Solid and Molten Martian Regolith Simulants
Paper number: 280-12
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:30 PM – 4:45 PM
Authors
-
Roger GaspardSt. Philip's College, San Antonio, TX
-
Tzieleah ReclaSt. Philip's College, San Antonio, TX
-
Austin PatridgeUniversity of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX
Abstract
Crewed missions to Mars will likely require construction of infrastructure via In Situ Resource Utilization (ISRU), applying technologies such as sintering, melting, and additive manufacturing to Martian regolith. Considerable effort has been expended in developing ISRU technologies for lunar applications, using volatile-poor lunar regolith simulants. An important question is whether the same technology can work with oxidized, volatile-rich Martian regolith or whether its mineralogical differences may require different technology.
We focused on 4 Martian simulants: MMS and Rocknest developed at NASA centers, and MGS-1 and JEZ-1 developed by Space Resource Technologies (SRT). We measured powder density using helium pycnometry; bulk and tap density using a graduated cylinder; loss oon ignition using a furnace and precision balance; heat capacity and enthalpies of fusion using differential scanning calorimetry (DSC); melt viscosity using rotating spindle viscometry (RSV); and thermal diffusivity and conductivity of quenched glasses using light flash analysis (LFA).
Particle density varied from 2680 kgm-3 (Mars-1) to 3010 kgm-3 (JEZ-1). Bulk densities (simulant poured into container) are 940 to 1440 kgm-3 with 51 to 67% porosity. Tap densities indicate that 15-20% of this porosity is lost after 9000 taps, resulting in compacted bulk densities of 1200-1640 kgm-3. During heating, all simulants show volatile outgassing below 400˚C, a glass transition between ~600̊˚C and 800̊˚C, and an endothermic melting peak between ~1100̊˚C and 1300̊˚C. The viscosity of molten MMS increases from 2.6 Pas at 1600˚C to ~300 Pas at 1150˚C, where minor crystallization was detected. These viscosities are similar to lunar highlands simulants (e.g. NUW-LHT-5M) but about 4 times higher than those of mare simulants (e.g. JSC-1A). Thermal diffusivity of glass made from MMS is low, ~0.6 mm2s-1 at room temperature, decreasing to ~0.5 mm2s-1 at 650˚C, which is similar to glasses made from various lunar simulants.
Martian regolith simulants typically have much higher volatile contents (2.5 to 8.5 wt% loss on ignition) compared to lunar variants. The JSC Rocknest simulant, which may be the best mineralogical match to actual Martian regolith, is extremely difficult to work with due to its high volatile content (water and sulfate) that causes bubbling and crucible overflows on heating. This suggests that technologies developed for volatile-poor lunar regolith may not translate easily to working with volatile-rich Martian regolith.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 57, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2025AM-413923
© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.