271 Geologic Energy Resources and Storage for Now and the Future (Posters)
This session seeks contributions describing research on multi-resource development efforts, non-traditional uses of fossil fuels, natural hydrogen and helium, CCUS, enhanced geothermal energy, storage of hydrogen and compressed air, and enhanced methane recovery and carbon storage in coal.
Wednesday, 22 October 2025
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
HBGCC, Hall 1
Modeling the influence of Ferrihydrite on Underground Hydrogen Storage: Redox vs. Non-Redox
Paper number: 271-3
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 8:00 AM
Authors
-
Shikha SharmaWest Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia
Abstract
Geochemical information on the viability and feasibility of hydrogen storage in subsurface formations of different lithologies is scarce. Iron (Fe), an abundant element in earth’s crust, plays a crucial role in regulating the geochemical interactions in subsurface reservoirs due to its potential to alter redox conditions. In this study, using abiotic reactive transport modeling in Geochemist's Workbench v18.0 X2t module, we evaluated the role of a geochemically abundant reactive amorphous iron mineral ferrihydrite six line (6L) in controlling the behavior of injected hydrogen in the subsurface reservoirs.
Upon injection of hydrogen, ferrihydrite, a Fe(III) phase gradually reduces to more reduced Fe(II) phases such as magnetite or soluble Fe(II). In our model, we used the maximum operational hydrogen partial pressure (100 bars) in subsurface reservoirs. The two dimensional reactive transport domain of 1 square meters was divided into 10×10 subdomains. The reactive domain mimics a sandstone block of known mineralogical composition and brine chemistry, which was reacted with 100 bars of gaseous hydrogen. Kinetic reduction rates obtained from previous literature were used for mineral dissolution and ferrihydrite reduction. Simulations run for 100 years demonstrate that ferrihydrite reduction is not only dependent upon hydrogen migration through the domain, but mostly dominated by the non-redox transformation into phases like goethite and magnetite in the presence of Fe(II). Rate of brine movement is also the main driver of such different transformation behavior, in addition to varying brine/mineral composition. pH directly alters such transformation, complying with prior experimental and field observations, as goethite formation may not be an intermediate step before complete reduction of Fe(III) phases. Overall, abiotic hydrogen consumption is minimal even after 100 years, although the progressive growth in partial pressure (pH2) is spatially contrained due to the presence of reactive Fe(III) phases.
Our initial modeling calls for extensive experimental study on the different reactive amorphous phases of Fe(III). Long term hydrogen stirage can be successful with cushion gases such as CO2, CH4 which can alter the brine chemistry and mineralogy, thereby indirectly affecting the redox driven hydrogen oxidation. Considering the overall complexity for net consumption hydrogen gas in the subsurface, we need to carefully evaluate the activities of redox-sensitive ions like Fe for appropriate site selection.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 57, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2025AM-414127
© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.