106 37th Annual Undergraduate Research Exhibition Sponsored by Sigma Gamma Epsilon (Posters)
All students are encouraged to submit research to this poster session. Investigations from ANY geological subdiscipline are welcome. Presenters who are SGE members are eligible to compete for monetary awards distributed at the meeting.
Monday, 20 October 2025
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
HBGCC, Hall 1
Comparing Carbon Percentage and Isotopic Composition in Mangrove Soils Using Bulk Analysis and Fine Fraction Methods
Paper number: 106-46
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 8:00 AM
Authors
-
Estefania Rodriguez Morillo Presenting AuthorUniversity of South Florida, Saint Petersburg, Florida
-
Beatriz Aguilar EnriquezUniversity of South Florida, St Petersburg, Florida
-
Joseph SmoakUniversity of South Florida, St Petersburg, Florida
-
Josh BreithauptFlorida State University, St Teresa, Florida
-
Brad RosenheimUniversity of South Florida, St Petersburg, Florida
-
Isabel RomeroUniversity of South Carolina, Columbia, SC
Abstract
Mangrove ecosystems are known for their ability to sequester and store atmospheric carbon in their peat soils. As a result, mangrove restoration or creation has become a natural solution to climate change. Restored and created mangroves especially contain a variety of lithological units, including sand, peat, and organic-rich mud, each with distinct physical and biogeochemical properties. Depending on the research objective, different analytical methods are used to quantify and characterize organic carbon in mangrove soils, ranging from bulk sample analysis for general organic carbon stock estimation to fine-fraction (<63 µm) analysis for radiocarbon dating. As such, the workload and complexity of comparative research between restored/created and natural mangroves can be considerable. This study aims to answer the question of whether there is a difference in organic carbon percentage and stable isotopic signature between the fine and bulk methods. To do this assessment, samples were collected from Tampa Bay and Naples (U.S.A.) and separated into three lithological units described in the field: peat, organic-rich mud, and sand. Samples were acidified with 1N HCl to remove the inorganic carbon fraction and analyzed using an Elemental Analyzer to determine organic carbon percentage and stable carbon isotopic signature. The results demonstrated that the <63 µm method yielded higher carbon percentage values compared to the bulk method across all three lithological units. In the <63 µm method, most of the sample is being filtered out, and only a finer organic carbon-rich fraction of the sediment is assessed for carbon content and isotopic composition. In contrast, the bulk method analyzes the entire sample after acid treatment, resulting in a more heterogeneous sample and, often to lower carbon percentage quantities. This study contributes to a better understanding of effective methods and techniques for optimizing the work done in the laboratory estimating blue carbon in mangrove ecosystems. Further research can help refine these methods to more efficiently enhance our understanding of this aquatic ecosystem and its role in the carbon cycle.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 57, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2025AM-414351
© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.