35 Minerals in Motion: Tracking Mineral Reactions Using In Situ and Synchrotron Techniques, A Celebration of the Career of Peter Heaney (Posters)

In celebration of the career of Dr. Peter Heaney, we invite submissions using in situ, synchrotron, X-ray, neutron, or electron techniques to study rates/mechanisms of mineral reactions, alongside contributions exploring new approaches to mineralogy education.

Sunday, 19 October 2025
8:00 AM - 5:30 PM
HBGCC, Hall 1

Exploring Handheld LIBS Calibration Techniques for Use with Igneous Rocks

Paper number: 35-4
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 8:00 AM

Authors

Abstract

Handheld laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) is a portable technique that uses laser ablation combined with an internal spectrometer and calibrated regression model to provide the geochemistry of a sample in a matter of seconds. However, a challenge for the community is that LIBS often performs poorly with rocks of heterogeneous textures, such as porphyritic igneous rocks [1,2]. This study aims to improve our ability to use LIBS on igneous rocks to measure their chemistry by testing the reliability of multiple calibration models, including using whole rock and the traditional pressed pellets [1]. Ten rock samples of differing composition and texture (rhyolitic tuff to granodiorite) from the McDermitt Caldera (Nevada, USA) were used for this study, where whole rock geochemical data was collected for each sample. Calibration models were created in the Sci Aps Profile Builder software, where an intensity ratio must be prepared by the user for each element. These intensity ratios are then paired with the known LA-ICP-MS geochemistry and spectra acquired from either a whole rock or its associated pellet. Six rock samples, both as a pellet and the cut rock face, were used for calibration. The other four were then used as unknowns to test the accuracy of whole rock calibrated scans against pellet calibrated scans. Preliminary results suggest that the whole rock calibrated scans overall perform better, but vary by element, where lower concentrations generally perform better than higher. Additionally, thirty scans per sample was shown to be insufficient for good calibration validation, yielding an average R2 of 0.6. Prior research suggests that up to 560 scans per sample may be required [2]. These results suggest that whole rock calibrations should be applied  when measuring unprocessed rock geochemistry. Future investigations need to target improving the construction of intensity ratios and the number of scans required for the best accuracy for each element.

[1] Yan et al. (2025). Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry.

[2] Fontana et al. (2023). Journal of Geochemical Exploration, 246.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 57, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2025AM-414369

© Copyright 2025 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.