10 Extinctions and Speciation During the Quaternary
Friday, 25 July 2003
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELS FOR TERMINAL PLEISTOCENE MEGAFAUNAL EXTINCTIONS AND MIS 5E
Paper number: 10-11
Program: SYMPOSIA
Time: 11:10 AM – 11:30 AM
Authors
Abstract
Also, faunal mosaics (i.e., environmental mosaics) during MIS 5e were significantly different than those of MIS 1. These differences could have facilitated greater faunal interchange between “biomes” thus allowing for larger geographic ranges of taxa. Since a taxon’s probability of extinction decreases with increasing geographic range, extinction probability would have been significantly lower in MIS 5e than in MIS 1. In addition, these distributional patterns of the Pleistocene resulted in non-analog faunas and environments in comparison to those of MIS 1. Consequently, arguments based on the disappearance or reduction of modern environments like tundra and grassland during MIS 5e without faunal extinction are not pertinent. Finally, if the terminal Pleistocene extinction was caused by a threshold effect, then whether the changes at MIS 5e and MIS1 are the same is irrelevant.