T13 Flow and Biogeochemical Processes at the Interface Between Surface Water and Groundwater
Sunday, 2 November 2003
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
CONDUIT FLOW: PATHWAYS TO POOR ASR RECOVERY AND SURFACEWATER CONTAMINATION IN FLORIDA
Paper number: T13-10
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:25 AM – 10:40 AM
Authors
-
Sydney T. BacchusApplied Environmental Svcs, Athens, GA
-
Timothy J. HazlettHazlett-Kincaid, Inc, Tallahassee, FL
Abstract
‘Recovery’ efficiency (at 250 mg/L chloride concentration) reported by USGS was 3.1%, 2.7%, and 7.2% (‘storage’ periods: 0, 8, and 5 days, respectively) for Lake Okeechobee ‘ASR’ wells proposed for use in the northern vicinity of the ERP. Actual ‘recovery’ efficiency was lower, since chloride concentrations of injected ‘recovery’ fluids were 150, 100, and 70 mg/L, respectively, for those tests. Dye tracer tests conducted this year by USGS in the Biscayne (surficial) aquifer, south of Lake Okeechobee, revealed groundwater travel times of several hours over distances predicted to require days. Evidence that injected fluids resurface in nearshore waters (induced discharge) is seen in stable nitrogen isotope data from macroalgae smothering reefs in southeast Florida.
Those results reflect conduit flow of injected fluids that can cause large-scale subsurface discharge of nutrients and other contaminants into Florida’s sensitive surface waters, including the surf zone. Poor ‘recovery’, rapid travel times, and discharge points for the karst aquifer system are not addressed by groundwater models used for decision-making. Similar flow responses have been addressed in other areas of the regional Floridan aquifer system using a finite-element groundwater model. This approach can identify probable discrete flow paths and discharge points.