T32 Geological Mapping: Key to Successful Management of Water and Land Resources (Posters)
Sunday, 2 November 2003
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
GEOMORPHIC ANALYSIS OF TECTONIC PROVINCES BASED ON SURFICIAL GEOLOGIC MAP DATABASES, EASTERN MOJAVE DESERT
Paper number: T32-60
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 12:00 PM
Authors
-
David R. BedfordMenlo Park, CA
-
Sarah E. RobinsonFlagstaff, AZ
-
Kevin SchmidtUSGS, Menlo Park, CA
-
David M. MillerUS Geol Survey, Menlo Park, CA
-
Christopher M. MengesTucson, AZ
-
Geoff PhelpsMenlo Park, CA
-
Lee AmorosoU.S. Geol Survey, Flagstaff, AZ
Abstract
Mountain front sinuosity assesses the influence of tectonic uplift, assuming that tectonically inactive mountain fronts will be more embayed than those of similar lithology undergoing recent tectonic uplift. Sinuosity is defined as the ratio of the length of the mountain front to the straight-line distance between the endpoints of the mountain front. Calculations for characteristic mountain fronts in each of the provinces show that tectonically active provinces have statistically lower mean sinuosity values than less tectonically active provinces. These results may be refined by addressing under-representation of mountain fronts in the mapped area, or by subdividing the mountain fronts based on lithologic character.
Drainage density (Dd, defined as length of channel per unit area, a function of climate, surface properties, and tectonics) was used to measure landscape dissection. Dd was calculated as the inverse of twice the distance to channel using DEMs. Maps of Dd indicate variations among tectonic provinces that probably reflect tectonically influenced geomorphic characteristics of dissection.