T56 What is a Magma Chamber? The Role of Sheets in the Assembly of Intrusions I
Sunday, 16 October 2005
1:30 PM - 5:30 PM
EVALUATING PLUTON GROWTH MODELS USING HIGH RESOLUTION GEOCHRONOLOGY: TUOLUMNE INTRUSIVE SUITE, SIERRA NEVADA, CA
Paper number: T56-11
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 4:20 PM – 4:35 PM
Authors
-
Roland MundilBerkeley Geochronology Ctr, Berkeley, CA
-
Scott PatersonUniv of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA
-
Paul RenneBerkeley Geochronology Ctr, Berkeley, CA
-
Sebastien NomadeBerkeley Geochronology Ctr, Berkeley, CA
Abstract
U/Pb analyses of single zircons using a thermal annealing/chemical abrasion pretreatment yield concordant clusters of data at ca. 86 Ma from two samples of the voluminous Cathedral Peak unit. These crystallization ages are younger than the published 88 Ma age from this unit in the southern TIS. The indistinguishable ages from samples ~4 km apart in the northern transect place constraints on the size of a potential Cathedral Peak magma chamber. Both samples also contain several 87-92 Ma zircon grains that we interpret as inherited from earlier phases of the TIS magma system and may indicate the collapse of early-formed internal contacts. Biotite 40Ar/39Ar ages from the TIS and host rock record cooling through ~340-390 °C and range from ca. 83 Ma to 85 Ma from the eastern and western margins of the TIS, respectively. These dates require rapid cooling (up to 400 °C/Ma) following emplacement of Cathedral Peak magma and necessitate an efficient heat transfer mechanism in the final stages of batholith construction. Our new results suggest that models which assume different shapes and sizes of magma pulses should be tested not only across transects but throughout the pluton and with geochronologic techniques yielding precise and accurate ages.