Geological Society of America

T68 Disseminating Best Practices and Resources Developed in Education Projects Funded by the National Science Foundation or by Other Federal/State Agencies (Posters)

Sunday, 25 September 2016
9:00 AM - 5:30 PM
Exhibit Hall E/F

THE SPATIAL THINKING WORKBOOK: DEVELOPING STUDENTS’ SPATIAL THINKING SKILLS IN UPPER-LEVEL UNDERGRADUATE GEOLOGY COURSES THROUGH CURRICULAR MATERIALS BASED ON COGNITIVE SCIENCE RESEARCH

Paper number: T68-7
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 5:30 PM

Authors

Carol Ormand Presenting Author
Carleton College, Northfield, MN
Thomas Shipley
Temple University, Philadelphia, PA
Basil Tikoff
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Barbara Dutrow
Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA
Laurel Goodwin
University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI
Thomas Hickson
University of St. Thomas, Saint Paul, MN
Kinnari R. Atit
Northwestern University, Evanston, IL
Kristin Gagnier
Science of Learning Institute, Baltimore, MD
Ilyse Resnick
University of Delaware, Newark, DE

Abstract

Spatial visualization is an essential prerequisite for understanding geological features at all scales, such as the atomic structures of minerals, the architecture of sedimentary deposits in an outcrop, or the geometry of the fault system along a complex plate boundary. Undergraduate geoscience majors bring a wide range of spatial skill levels to their courses. Fortunately, spatial thinking improves with practice, and students benefit from intentional training. Several promising teaching strategies for improving spatial skills have emerged from recent cognitive science research into spatial thinking, including the use of gesture, predictive sketching, and comparison, including analogy and alignment. Not surprisingly, geoscience educators have traditionally incorporated many of these tools, though not always consciously, intentionally, and in the most effective ways.

Our research team, composed of geoscientists and cognitive psychologists, has collaborated to develop curricular materials for Mineralogy, Structural Geology, and Sedimentology & Stratigraphy courses that incorporate these strategies intentionally and purposefully, supporting student understanding of the spatially challenging concepts and skills in these courses. Collectively, these two dozen learning activities comprise the Spatial Thinking Workbook. Eight are specific to Mineralogy, five to Sedimentology & Stratigraphy, seven to Structural Geology, and five can be utilized in any course. Pre- to post-test gains on a suite of assessment instruments, as well as embedded assessments, show that these curricular materials boost students’ spatial thinking skills and also strengthen their ability to solve geological problems with a spatial component. Keys to the development of successful activities are the identification of a spatially challenging concept or skill and the effective use of one or more strategies that support spatial thinking.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 48, No. 7

doi: 10.1130/abs/2016AM-281704

© Copyright 2016 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.