T218 Making Sense of Methodologies and Theoretical Frameworks in Geoscience Education Research

Wednesday, 13 October 2021
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
B112

METAPHOR IN GEOSCIENCE: CATEGORIZING DIRECT, INDIRECT, AND IMPLIED METAPHORS TO UNDERSTAND TEACHING AND LEARNING

Paper number: T218-9
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:50 AM – 10:05 AM

Authors

Abstract

With the publishing of Lakoff and Johnson’s book, “Metaphors we live by” in the 1980s, researchers in the emergent fields of embodied cognition and cognitive linguistics have been interested in how language, and especially metaphor impacts how people think and act. This research has spread more recently into science education within the theoretical framework of conceptual metaphor theory (CMT). Conceptual metaphor is giving meaning to an abstract concept (target) in terms of a more concrete concept (source), one developed from embodied experiences. Characteristic of metaphors is that they highlight some aspects of reality while hiding others. Experts are aware of what is highlighted and hidden yet take it for granted when teaching or writing textbooks. Novices, who do not know which aspects they are supposed to consider or ignore, can interpret the metaphor in unintended ways, impeding understanding. Science education researchers have used CMT to explain how instructors teach, and how students learn. However, very little of this research has occurred within the geosciences. Our group is analyzing geoscience textbooks and social media content, using the MIPVU methodology for linguistic metaphor identification, to find direct metaphors, those used deliberately for teaching (injecting water into a balloon is like magma injected into surrounding rock formations); indirect metaphors, scientific terminology that is metaphorical (crust, tectonic plate, parent rock, daughter element), and implied metaphors, those implicit within the text and reflecting the understanding of the author. For instance, A SCIENTIFIC ARGUMENT IS A COMPETITION with opposing sides, one argument being favored to win, and compelling the opposition to believe the winning argument. We will first map out the metaphor use then try to understand its influence on communication and learning. Then, in places with problematic metaphor use, we would develop new metaphors to enhance learning outcomes.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 53, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2021AM-367459

© Copyright 2021 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.