T161 Iris Moreno Totten Research in Geoscience Education Session

Tuesday, 11 October 2022
8:00 AM - 12:00 PM
506

A PILOT STUDY OF HOW EVOLUTION UNDERSTANDING, EVOLUTION ACCEPTANCE, AND PERCEPTIONS OF CONFLICT BETWEEN RELIGION AND EVOLUTION ARE AFFECTED BY BIOLOGY, GEOSCIENCE, AND SCIENCE EDUCATION COURSES AT A RELIGIOUSLY AFFILIATED INSTITUTION

Paper number: T161-10
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 10:15 AM – 10:30 AM

Authors

Abstract

Understanding and acceptance of the theory of evolution are crucial components of science literacy, and widespread non-acceptance of evolution may have far reaching policy consequences for human health, environmental sustainability, and educational practices. The most prevalent indicator of non-acceptance of evolution among college students remains student's self-identified faith and perceived conflict of evolution with religion (Sinatra et al. 2003; Betti et al. 2020). This may have consequences for other aspects of diversity in biology and the geosciences (Barnes et al. 2020). We are seeking to evaluate how different instructor identities and instructional techniques may influence student evolution understanding, acceptance of evolution, and perceptions of these conflicts in the context of a religiously affiliated university. To address these questions, we administered a Qualtrics survey to students before and after discussing evolutionary biology in participating biology, geoscience, and education courses. Surveys included collection of demographic information, the macroevolution component of the I-SEA inventory (Nadelson & Southerland 2012), two segments of the Perceived Conflict of Religion and Evolution instrument (Barnes et al. 2021), questions respecting student perceptions of their instructors and how evolution would be/was treated in class, and related open response questions. Students were also invited to participate in post-course interviews. In the science education courses, students also wrote a brief science teaching philosophy statement which provided a source of additional qualitative information. Student perspectives included atheistic evolution, theistic evolution, microevolution with special creation, and opinions that could be categorized as a viewpoint that evolution and religion are "non-overlapping magisteria". Evolution understanding, acceptance, and perceptions of conflict did not appear strongly affected across each semester, but there were differences in understanding and acceptance between those enrolled in science courses and those enrolled in education classes.

Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 54, No. 6

doi: 10.1130/abs/2022AM-381775

© Copyright 2022 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.