248 Geoscience Education (Posters)
Wednesday, 3 November 2010
8:00 AM - 6:00 PM
Hall D
HOW MUCH NON-TRADITIONAL TEACHING DOES IT TAKE TO DRAMATICALLY IMPROVE LEARNING GAINS IN INTRODUCTORY PHYSICAL GEOLOGY?
Paper number: 248-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 8:00 AM – 6:00 PM
Authors
-
Katrien J. van der Hoeven KraftMesa Community College at Red Mountain, Mesa, AZ
-
Catharine KnightThe University of Akron, Akron, OH
-
Karl R. WirthMacalester College, Saint Paul, MN
-
David A. McConnellNorth Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
-
Ann Bykerk-KauffmanCalifornia State Univ, Chico, Chico, CA
-
Ronald K. MatheneyUniversity of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND
-
Dexter PerkinsUniversity of North Dakota, Grand Forks, ND
-
Jennifer A. StempienUniversity of Colorado at Boulder, Boulder, CO
Abstract
RTOP scores ranged from 19 to 87. Averaged normalized learning gains on the CI ranged from 18.6% to 47.4%. RTOP and CI positively covary with a R2 value of 0.67. If students score high on a question prior to instruction (>90% correct), then there is little potential for a learning gain. Adjusting for this phenomena results in an even stronger relationship between RTOP and CI (R2 = 0.89). Based on results from our pre-instruction CI, students enter introductory physical geology with strong pre-existing knowledge on geologic time and plate tectonics (average 54.3% correct pre-instruction). Learning gains are not high for traditionally taught courses – lecturing and limited use of clickers produced average learning gains <30%.
Instructors with the highest RTOP scores (> 60) and learning gains > 50% used multiple strategies to engage students with content during class and force students to reflect on their understanding of critical concepts during and outside of class. If one is serious about educating students, the results indicate significant and substantial changes are needed beyond the traditional lecture. Just adding a few activities or interventions will not have great effect.