T259 Geoscience Education Research: Implications for Undergraduate Geoscience Teaching and Learning (Posters)
Tuesday, 24 October 2017
9:00 AM - 6:30 PM
Halls 4EF
IDENTIFYING AND PRIORITIZING GEOSCIENCE EDUCATION RESEARCH GRAND CHALLENGES: DRAFT PLANS FOR A COMMUNITY RESEARCH AGENDA
Paper number: T259-5
Program: Technical Sessions
Time: 9:00 AM – 6:30 PM
Authors
-
Katherine RykerEastern Michigan University, Ypsilanti, MI
-
Steven SemkenArizona State University, Tempe, AZ
-
Rachel TeasdaleCSU Chico, Chico, CA
-
Cinzia CervatoIowa State University, Ames, IA
-
Kim A. KastensColumbia University, Palisades, NY
-
Heather MacdonaldCollege of William and Mary, Williamsburg, VA
-
John McDaris1 North College St.Science Education Resource Center, Northfield, MN
-
Karen McNealAuburn University, Auburn, AL
-
Heather L. PetcovicWestern Michigan University, Kalamazoo, MI
-
Eric PyleJames Madison University, Harrisonburg, VA
-
Eric M. RiggsTexas A&M University, College Station, TX
Abstract
As an emerging STEM education research field, the GER community is examining the current state of their research and considering the best course forward so that it can have the greatest collective impact on advancing teaching and learning in the geosciences. As part of an NSF-funded multi-step effort to meet this need, 45 researchers drafted priority research questions, or “Grand Challenges”, that span ten research themes on undergraduate geoscience teaching and learning. These themes include research on: students’ conceptual understanding of the solid and the fluid Earth, K-12 teacher preparation, teaching about Earth in the context of societal problems, access and success of underrepresented groups in the geosciences, spatial and temporal reasoning, quantitative reasoning and use of models, instructional strategies to improve geoscience learning, students' self-regulated learning, and faculty professional development and institutional change. For each theme, several Grand Challenges have been proposed, and are now ready for their first round of peer review, which at GSA will include this presentation and a Town Hall event.
It is our vision that the final outcomes of this community-grounded process will be a published guiding framework to (1) focus future GER on questions of high interest to the geoscience education researcher and practitioner community, (2) provide funding agencies with a strong rationale for including GER in future funding priorities, (3) increase the strength of evidence of GER community claims, and (4) elevate the visibility, stature, and collaborative potential of GER in the geosciences and in STEM education research.
Geological Society of America Abstracts with Programs. Vol. 49, No. 6
doi: 10.1130/abs/2017AM-298851
© Copyright 2017 The Geological Society of America (GSA), all rights reserved. Permission is hereby granted to the author(s) of this abstract to reproduce and distribute it freely, for noncommercial purposes. Permission is hereby granted to any individual scientist to download a single copy of this electronic file and reproduce up to 20 paper copies for noncommercial purposes advancing science and education, including classroom use, providing all reproductions include the complete content shown here, including the author information. All other forms of reproduction and/or transmittal are prohibited without written permission from GSA Copyright Permissions.